Star Charts 101 and Practices is a practical training book for astronomy enthusiasts and students preparing for star-chart and observational rounds. This graph reads the current complete StarMaps101.tex, not only its table of contents, and compares its teaching content with explicitly recognized observation tasks.
Navigation comes from StarMaps101.toc; semantic associations come from the complete StarMaps101.tex.
The graph is rebuilt in the browser from the current StarMaps101.tex every time the page loads. The TOC supplies navigation and page labels, but it does not decide topic importance. Section, subsection, and subsubsection bodies are read from the complete TeX source, cleaned, split into comparable text windows, and represented in the same semantic space. The graph then measures three different things separately: how prominently the book discusses a topic, how closely book topics are related to one another, and how closely each IOAA 2025 observation task matches the book.
For term \(q\) in text window \(d\), the page uses log-scaled TF–IDF:
Here \(f_{q,d}\) is the term count, \(n_q\) is the number of documents containing the term, and \(N\) is the current set of book windows plus the IOAA task documents. New or revised TeX therefore changes the vector space automatically.
Every substantive section, subsection, or subsubsection becomes a live topic. Let \(\mathbf v_A\) be the vector built from the complete body of topic \(A\). Its activation in book window \(d\) is
Topic prominence is the normalized amount of discussion across the whole current book:
Node size follows \(P(A)\). No IOAA marks enter this quantity.
Two topics are related when they become active in the same parts of the book. Using their activation profiles across all book windows,
Blue/violet topic-to-topic lines use \(R(A,B)\). This makes the cluster a map of the current book first, before IOAA 2025 is added as an external comparison layer.
Each OM, OT, and OP scored task is represented by its question meaning and the skills needed to carry it out. Its similarity to book topic \(A\) is
Every task is treated equally. The green task links use \(S(A,u)\); marks are retained only as factual task metadata and never affect node size, link strength, or topic importance.
For each book topic, external IOAA relevance is the mean of its strongest \(k\) task similarities:
The green halo around a book node follows \(Q(A)\). A prominence-weighted book-to-IOAA alignment index is also reported:
This asks whether the topics emphasized by the current book are also relevant to the 2025 observation tasks.
The layout is ForceAtlas2/LinLog-inspired. Prominent topics repel more strongly, while book-relatedness and IOAA-similarity edges attract according to their own relevance weights:
There are no meaningful axes. Read node size as book prominence, neighbourhood as conceptual relatedness, and green connections/halos as IOAA 2025 topical similarity.